R. Ashwin retired from international cricket today, aged 38 years and 92 days. He played 106 Tests, 116 ODIs and 65 T20Is for India from June 5, 2010 to December 8, 2024. He retired almost exactly 18 years after his first class debut for Tamil Nadu against Haryana on December 9, 2006. He bowled 70 overs in that debut match. He has bowled nearly 7000 overs in first class cricket in all and collected 779 first class wickets, including 537 in Tests.
Ashwin is India’s greatest Test match winner to date. Of the 39 bowlers who have at least 300 Test wickets to their name, only three bowlers before him - Muralitharan, Hadlee and Lillee - managed at least five wicket per Test. It takes 20 wickets to win a Test, and Ashwin collected 5 per match on average. He also made 3503 Test runs to go with his 500 wickets. Only Stuart Broad has completed the 3500 runs, 500 wickets double in Test cricket before Ashwin. It took Broad 157 Tests to do it. Ashwin did it in his 106th. Measured another way, of the 3204 cricketers who have earned a Test cap, Ashwin is the only one to have more than 500 Test wickets and 5 Test hundreds.
I have written about Ashwin before in these pages [2024, 2020]. He was arguably the most creative bowler of his generation - the Shane Warne of his generation if you will. His variety was a consequence of his relentless inquiry into batters, batting and bowling. His success was down to his iron discipline and competitiveness. His undercutter was the most successful variation in Test cricket in living memory. It formed the cornerstone of his success against left handers in Test cricket. It was delivered with the seam orthogonal to the direction of the ball. This allowed Ashwin to impart revs on the ball and prevent the ball from dipping on the batter. It was the finger spinner’s version of the wrist spinner’s flipper (Shane Warne’s masterful version in the 1990s was similarly lethal).
Beyond his record, Ashwin demonstrated the essential characteristic of a great genius - he was an original. Nothing he did was derivative or an imitation of something others could do. It was, always, an original solution to the problem which confronted him. He was prepared to bowl in the classical fashion, outside the right hander’s off stump. He was also prepared to bowl straighter when the conditions demanded it. At other times, he would bowl from round the wicket to the right hander. He was a master of each of these lines of attack. In his final Test, he bowled a brilliant 17 over spell in conditions which offered nothing for the finger spinner (his great contemporary Nathan Lyon bowled 1 over in the whole match). His returns were not spectacular - 1/53. But he tested, and troubled, ever batter he bowled to and induced errors from all of them.
Ashwin will be difficult to replace in the Indian Test eleven. But he will, hopefully, find a public place in cricket in the years to come. He has already developed an original voice on his Youtube station. His recent memoir, co-authored with Sidharth Monga, ends on the eve of his international debut. A second part of the memoir covering his international career is now required. There is also a severe shortage of the bowler’s voice in the Test match commentary box. Ashwin would be a fine addition there. These are, however, selfish wishes on my part. Ashwin is far more likely to become a coach or a team director in the future, both in the international and league arena. Whatever he does will be rewarding for cricket fans.
I would also like to hear Ashwin in the commentary box. I certainly believe that he is a cerebral person and would be able to completely hold his own in the comm-box.
I certainly hope to hear him dissect bowling plans and batting techniques, without fear or favour (something that Indian commentators and cricket-pundits are reluctant/afraid to do).
HAVING SAID THAT, we must also admit and acknowledge, that Ashwin benefited tremendously from BCCI's policy/strategy of preparing Turners and often RANK Turners in India.
While he averaged over 5 wickets per Test overall - in India his numbers being 5.83 wickets/Test at an average of 21.57; his corresponding numbers
- in Australia are 3.63 wickets per Test at an average of 42.42,
- in England against England are (14 wickets in 6 matches at the cost of 461 runs) 2.3 wickets per
Test at an average of 33, and
- in South Africa are 1.57 wickets per Test at an average of very nearly 50!
Those are scant returns; hardly figures of the 'greatest match winner'. The author has often beaten James Anderson with the same stick.
The fact, that in all those countries, India have won more matches WITHOUT Ashwin, than they have with him in the XI, is a truer reflection of his stature and ability than any other bit of emotion-driven hyperbole.
For such a 'great match winner' he doesn't have a single 5-wicket haul in Australia, England, South Africa and New Zealand (admittedly, the sample size is small - 1 match 3 wickets, average 33).
We all remember him being 'out-bowled' by Panesar, Swann, O'Keefe, Lyon, Kuhnemann, Hartley, Santner, Ajaz Patel and even Glenn Philips in India. But there have been
instances where he has been 'out-bowled' by opposition spinners in England, Australia and even South Africa. I can recall at least 4 such instances.
The author often states that Ashwin and Bumrah are India's greatest match winners. India's own Warne and McGrath! It should be a no-brainer then, that they play together in all matches. Yet Ashwin has been dropped as often as he has been picked in the 'SENA' countries.
That is a truer assessment of Ashwin. Australia would never drop Warne for an Andy Bichel or even a Brett Lee, no matter how spin-unfriendly that wicket might be. (Although they ONCE dropped him for Adam Dale, because Brian Lara had smashed the day-lights out of him.)
Deep down, I am sure, Ashwin knew that he just isn't (and hasn't been) good enough to win matches in these conditions. And when New Zealand dominated him in India, he probably
realized that he isn't nearly the force that he used to be, in India too.
On a more cheerful note, I think his batting had much more potential and he could well have replaced either Sharma or Kohli in the middle-order (on current form),
as a pure Batsman.
Ashwin has been India's greatest match winner*.
*Condition apply.
What is the difference between an off-spinners slider and the undercutter?